This paper focuses on thosenating know-how, one of the six communicative competencies proposed by this author-researcher in the book Evolutionary Communication in Consciential Interactions (Seno, 2013), deepening the analysis of thosenation, exploring possible ways of balancing thosenity, and seeking to apply thosenation know-how during group interactions. The objective of the paper is to propose the possibility of achieving thosenic balance using the think-feel-express triad and to evaluate the effects of each item in the multidimensional thosenation of a conscin’s everyday life, a synthesis based on the author's experiences. The methodology used was literature review and self-research, self and heteroexperiences, and the author’s self-reflection. The paper concludes with a personal proposal for a technique to expand thosenating know-how (TKWET) to help one qualify thosenity and coherence in personal consciential manifestations.
Conscientia Ana Seno Vol 28 - Supplement 1 - July 2024 (2024-07)
This article is founded on casuistic of the author based on personal observation about the incidental leadership attribute in group. The aim is to clarify aspects of cosmoethic leadership presenting, equally, view points of anticosmoethic leadership and how to use this observation to qualify the attribute of leadership.
This article aims to make it possible to reflect upon the use of cosmoethic freedom related to the application of premisses that constitute the bases of the consciential paradigm, with emphasis on Cosmoethics, specifically
referring to the use of parapsychism emerged in the interactions with conscins and consciexes. Consciential self-experimentation, as a Conscientiology scientific method, allowed the author to develop this study, as
a result of consciential laboratory (labcon) self-livings in the use of parapsychism, in a perspective of power that this attribute makes it possible when included in the Cosmoethics Personal Code (CPC) and in the
responsibilities that self-conscientization brings in the multidimensional and interassistantial here-now. It approaches, based on this reflection, the baiting of pathological consciexes and the challenge to maintain lucidity, noticing the repercussions of the holossoma and understanding the assistantial role in context that demanded self-knowledge expansion and theoretical researches for the practical living of Cosmoethics. The
solid and discerned wish to position oneself in face of multidimensional assistantial demands guided this study and favored the understanding of daily energetic changes and intraphysical power that parapsychism
brings to a conscin who sees itself in a practical learning of Cosmoethics application, even in face of the limitations imposed by the condition of being a pre-serenissimus, amplifying this study.
This article presents the author’s self-research related to the development of proactive collaborative cosmoethic leadership. To this end, it shows not only important traits to achieve evolutionary leadership but also optimized
attributes of interassistantial coordination.
For the intraphysical consciounesses in general, human life, per se, presents countless challenges from the most varied types and forms. As for the intermissive conscin, who deal with multidimensionality daily, these
challenges can be amplified in an exponential way, increasing the nuances and difficulties of the daily life, which require more attention and meticulousness when facing the facts and parafacts of the routine. Aiming to qualify such a scenario, the author makes use of his experiences, reflections and recyclings, as well as research in specific bibliography, to find the relations between the theorice development of Self-cosmoethics and the qualification of multidimensional Conviviology of the interemissivist consciouness. To do this, the author describes his personal experience in the use of three techniques of self-cosmoethics development and the impacts in the relation itself with multidimensionality. Lastly, the author concludes that the intermissivist is capable of applying techniques to refine the precepts of his/her personal cosmoethic action, reaching new evolutionary levels for him/herself and surrounding consciousnesses.
This article is based on the author’s experimentation over the question of prehuman consumption, starting from personal reflections regarding the consciential paradigm, specifically the holophylosophy of Cosmoethics.
The researcher ponders over the cosmoethic effects applied both to the individual consciousness and the planetary damage resulting from prehuman consumption. In this way, the text presents some data of the
conventional science apart from cosmoethic aspects involved in this dilemma, pointing, mainly, to consequences to the cosmoethic evolutionary way.
Cosmoethos Gabriel Barreiros v2. n.2 (2022) (2022)
In the conscientiological discourse upon which cosmoethic principlology is based, two principles, among many others, are fundamental: “may the best happens to all” and “the thing that is not worth is not worth indeed”. Although such principles integrate the same discourse and are used to solve the same problem of moral order and simultaneously, both highlight completely opposite approaches. To better explain this opposition,
such principles are brought closer, by analogy, to two philosophical trends which rival in the area of Ethics: utilitarianism, by Jeremy Bentham; and the Kantian Ethics, by Immanuel Kant. In view of that, the aim is to verify whether it is possible to make them compatible with the principles that inform the democratic political regime.
To begin with, the article develops the fundamentals of democracy, analysing the word, the historic context and presenting its meaning. The methodology used for this work was: bibliographical revision, cosmogram, debates and paraperceptions. Secondly, criticisms concerning the flawed use of this word will be presented, instigating critical debate with the purpose of deconstruct or present a new perspective. Is democracy really being applied? Do we live in a Democratic Constitutional State? And how is world perception influenced? Continuing the analyses, the text demonstrates that the evolutionary level of the group influences in the quality of democracy and that democracy, on its own, is not a cosmoethic component. Lastly, the concept of democracy will be broaden, in accordance with consciential paradigm and its multidimensional application, taking into consideration cosmoethic principles.
Cosmoethos Thiago Silva Cunha v1. n.1 (2019) (2019)
This article aims to focus on self-cosmoethicity and its effects in the interassistantial expansion through the clarification task, especially, the one done by a verbetographer in the Encyclopedia of Conscientiology. This research was carried out based on the experiences of the author as a self-inclusion in the maxiproexological megaproject of verbetography and conscientiological encyclopedism in conversion with the qualification of the posture of self-cosmoethic. The research aims, as a concrete result, the technical deepening in the development of self-cosmoethicity aiming at the expansion of interassistanciality via verbetographic clarification
task and encyclopedism, tools capable of being better used by consciounesses in evolution.
The aim of this article is to make a theorice reflection upon the experience of evolutionary values in the democratic process of a country. For that, the content here presented was elaborated considering specific
studies of the theme, lessons on the subject taught at the CI where the author volunteers and the daily applicability of these values within the democratic regime in which the author is living in this present life.
The main idea is to show readers, especially intermissivist readers, the importance in identifying our evolutionary values and the feasibility of this concept for the proexological complexis. The text shows readers
where these values come from, how to identify them, what the relation between Ethics and Cosmoethics is, in addition to giving applicable examples to the democratic process in which we are inserted. The article
still talks about the axiological theses which help us to understand the formation of values in the history of the western culture and an upgrade which we can make to take our values to another level. In the last part,
the text highlights an evolutionary value, solidarity, and shows how we can theorice it in our daily life.