This article aims to make it possible to reflect upon the use of cosmoethic freedom related to the application of premisses that constitute the bases of the consciential paradigm, with emphasis on Cosmoethics, specifically
referring to the use of parapsychism emerged in the interactions with conscins and consciexes. Consciential self-experimentation, as a Conscientiology scientific method, allowed the author to develop this study, as
a result of consciential laboratory (labcon) self-livings in the use of parapsychism, in a perspective of power that this attribute makes it possible when included in the Cosmoethics Personal Code (CPC) and in the
responsibilities that self-conscientization brings in the multidimensional and interassistantial here-now. It approaches, based on this reflection, the baiting of pathological consciexes and the challenge to maintain lucidity, noticing the repercussions of the holossoma and understanding the assistantial role in context that demanded self-knowledge expansion and theoretical researches for the practical living of Cosmoethics. The
solid and discerned wish to position oneself in face of multidimensional assistantial demands guided this study and favored the understanding of daily energetic changes and intraphysical power that parapsychism
brings to a conscin who sees itself in a practical learning of Cosmoethics application, even in face of the limitations imposed by the condition of being a pre-serenissimus, amplifying this study.
The present article was based on the personal experience of the author in different areas of power within the International Cosmoethical Conscientiological Community (ICCC), Cognópolis, Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, combined with self-reflections and analyses coming from daily work in the Encyclopedia of Conscientiology, as well as respective specific self-research involving Cosmoethicology. This study suggests concepts and reflections to do with cosmoethic politicality as an ability to be conquered or acquired by conscientiologists interested in evolutionary self-coherencelisation. Considering the political principle of groupkarmic inseparability and the principle of evolutionary interdependency, the text presented aims to enlarge the cosmovision on individual responsibilities and the neopositionings related to consciential power inherent to all, substantiated by pre-resomatic Intermissive Course, exercised and exemplified by neoencyclopedism. The development of advanced diversified consciential attributes follows the theorice experience of various political, homeostatic aspects suggested in the Encyclopedia of Conscientiology. The neoencyclopedic ativism turns into an appropriate mean for such re-education, converging to the theorice development of cosmoethic politicality. Such advanced skill seems to be relevant to a successful experience of the Consciential Paradigmology, namely in Cognopolis, Foz do Iguaçu, where most of the pioneer intermissivists are now, especially, in relation to neocognitions, self-overcomings and evolutionary self-imposed achievements.
The article presents some lesson learnt in the exercise of power, as a volunteer of a International Cosmoethical Conscientiological Community (ICCC), having the opportunity to obtain theoretical and practical understanding
concerning aspects of consciential bond, including cosmoethic leadership points as an important interassistantial tool in favour of the evolutionary group of Conscientiology. The text clears up the fact that conscientiology leadership requires coherent performance in accordance with the basic assumptions of Conscientiology constituting then evolutionary individual and group megachallenge. It is the duty of the
conscientiocentric manager in the personal course of evolutionary leader to give the best to meet demands related to the post, striving to make the most out of the opportunities presented to immerse in group relations,
with consciential opening to live harmonically with different evolutionary levels, without deficitary omission, doing claritask and, at the same time, trying to respect the assistantial limit of the assisted audience. The
research shows part of the path of the author while performing leadership work and reflects on resulting risks and benefits. The methodology of research is based on the results of observations, hetero-observations,
register and analyses of facts and parafacts of consciential interrelations in the conviviality of conscientiology volunteering.
The present article starts from an understanding that Conscientiocentric Institutions (CIs) can perfect patterns in the use of power and people management. It aims to suggest premises for reflection upon recurrent problematic in order to turn its environment more harmonic, productive and democratic.
Cosmoethos Elizabeth Pigozzo, Samir de Moraes v1. n.1 (2019) (2019)